Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.0 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
1
Accepted
2019
4.6 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Process speed of the journal was normal compared to others and each process step was displayed in journal submission website. In my case, 3 external reviewers who were the expert of their fields reviewed my manuscript. First decision was major revision with lots of comments. The review points were reasonable, but little bit exausting. As a result, I feel like the review improved my paper. I think the review process time was totally dependent on the reviewer's personal schedule, not on the editiorial process.
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017