Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: This journal can turn around articles v. quickly. The editor is engaged in the process. I have published a few articles in this and have always been impressed by its commitment to doing a good job. Reviewers are mostly (not always) constructive and helpful. Articles I have published here have a solid citation outcome, often better than ones I have published in ostensibly better ranked UK or US journals.
Motivation: It is a long period of time for the editors to give you the first outcome that the manuscript is out of scope. However, admin is a very responsive.
Motivation: The submission was a short commentary paper. I believe the review process should have been shorter considering this.