Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.9 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The reviewers and editor were critical but constructive. Their focussed feedback resulted in us revising the manuscript and ending up with a stronger article overall. I would highly recommend this journal
n/a
n/a
20 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
10.3 weeks
15.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
Very kind editor giving fast responses.
7.6 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
This was overall a very positive and rewarding experience. The editor and reviewers provided constructive, thoughtful, and supportive feedback. The editor was timely in notifying us of the decisions and was prompt responding to emails. Ultimately we ended up with a stronger paper thanks to this process. I would highly recommend this journal.