Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.9 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
4.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
2013
Motivation: Only complaint is just one reviewer. More opinions would be welcomed. My reviewer was young, probably student. That was obvious from the comments. Having someone more experienced to review the paper would be beneficial.