Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
103 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
Motivation:
Unfortunately, my experience with this journal was far from satisfactory. It took more than three months for the editor to simply state that they were not interested in the topic of my paper! This level of delay and lack of transparency in the review process reflects a disorganized and inefficient system, which is unacceptable for a scientific or professional journal.
Journals should act more responsibly and provide timely responses instead of wasting months of researchers' time. If you are looking for a professional and responsive journal, I strongly recommend staying away from this one.
Journals should act more responsibly and provide timely responses instead of wasting months of researchers' time. If you are looking for a professional and responsive journal, I strongly recommend staying away from this one.
27.3 weeks
27.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
Rejected after review with no possible revisions, with one negative review stating necessary information is missing when the reviewer misunderstood the manuscript that had the information.
28.6 weeks
28.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
Although the opinions from the reviewers seemed to suggest a minor revision of the work, the paper was fully rejected due to "The reviewers have advised against publication of your manuscript and I must therefore reject it at this time". The editor proposed the option to resubmit the manuscript after substantial changes
8.4 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
We received only one superficial review after 2 months of wait, with outright rejection as decision...
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 84.0 days
Drawn back
2019
Motivation:
I decided to withdraw my manuscript after the editor couldn't find reviewers for more than two and a half months