Reviews for "Applied Surface Science"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Applied Surface Science	4.9 weeks	9.3 weeks	n/a	1	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Applied Surface Science	Motivation: In overall the review process was ok, but I would expect opinion of more than one reviewer.
Applied Surface Science	3.0 weeks	3.0 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	0 (very bad)	Rejected
Applied Surface Science	Motivation: As per my knowledge, the majority number of review reports are positive then they are willing to publish. But in this case, the editor is claiming that they need all (in my case 3 review reports) reviewers should give positive (instead of majority reports) to proceed further for the acceptance of the work to publish. It is very strange!!!!!
Applied Surface Science	8.3 weeks	8.3 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Applied Surface Science	Motivation: The experience with the journal was good. Three reviewers were assigned and a total of more than 10 questions were raised including the grammer. All questions were answered and sent back to the editor. Result: Accepted without further revision
Applied Surface Science	9.9 weeks	12.7 weeks	n/a	1	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Applied Surface Science	Motivation: I received constructive comments from reviewers, which could improve the quality of our paper. Although the review took a little longer, the overall review process was not bad.
Applied Surface Science	12.3 weeks	12.3 weeks	n/a	2	3 (good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Applied Surface Science	2.7 weeks	2.7 weeks	n/a	1	0 (very bad)	4 (very good)	Rejected
Applied Surface Science	Motivation: Reviewer comments were indicting that the reviewer have not gone through the manuscript well enough and have given his/her advise for shake of formality.