Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
1.6 weeks
2.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2026
Motivation:
This experience was exactly how peer review is meant to be. The editor and reviewers were engaged, the reviewers had excellent suggestions for the manuscript, the editor asked for reasonable revisions to be completed, and everything was fast.
3.6 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
The manuscript was sent out for review almost immediately after submission (the journal notified me it was in review the day after submission). I received a response from editor, with two reviews, indicating ms required modification three weeks later. After making the suggested revisions, ms was accepted the same day I submitted the revisions. A very straightforward and efficient process.
2.9 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Drawn back
2020
2.9 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
Quick review processing with 3 good quality reviews. The corrections were checked and the manuscript accepted in 5 hours! A great experience compared to other journals.
5.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2016
6.6 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015