Reviews for "Annales Henri Poincare"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
11.7 weeks	23.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted	2018
Motivation: One of the first two reviews helped us to improve the paper; this review was done very thoroughly.
n/a	n/a	7.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2016
25.3 weeks	25.3 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	2 (moderate)	Rejected	2014
Motivation: First, there is no editorial manager web site, the paper should be submitted by email. The first email received no answer. After 3 days with no answer, I wrote again, and they said they received no email from me. So I sent again the same email, and this time they received it. Another problem was the long time it took to have an answer: I asked for information after almost 4 months, and they answered that there is still no information. After another 50 days I asked again, with no answer. I asked again after a week, still with no answer.