Reviews for "Annales Henri Poincare"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
11.7
weeks
23.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: One of the first two reviews helped us to improve the paper; this review was done very thoroughly.
n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
25.3
weeks
25.3
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: First, there is no editorial manager web site, the paper should be submitted by email.
The first email received no answer. After 3 days with no answer, I wrote again, and they said they received no email from me. So I sent again the same email, and this time they received it.
Another problem was the long time it took to have an answer: I asked for information after almost 4 months, and they answered that there is still no information. After another 50 days I asked again, with no answer. I asked again after a week, still with no answer.