Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2022
15.7 weeks
15.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2019
Motivation: Remarks of one of the reviewers indicated that he was not familiar with the statistical method used in the manuscript (information-theoretic approach). Nevertheless, the reviewer criticised the statistical analysis and even made an incorrect statement about one aspect of it (interpretation of the odds ratio). Two editors, who rated the manuscript, did not dismiss the obviously untrue comments on the statistics and the manuscript was rejected. There were other reasons for rejection, too, and I do accept them, but the statistical issues should not have been mentioned among them and/or perhaps a third review could have been invited.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014