Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.1 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Rejected
2024
Motivation: The review process was very fast and smooth. The reviews were mostly fair and very helpful in identifying places for improvements. The editor handled the review process professionally.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 118.0 days
Drawn back
2020
5.0 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2019
11.6 weeks
11.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Rejected
2020
5.4 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2017
8.1 weeks
11.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2018
8.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Excellent all round. Considered and useful reviewer and editorial comments improved the paper. We alo really appreciated the effort made by the copy editor to make sure everything was as clear as possible.
9.3 weeks
14.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2018
4.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
10.4 weeks
10.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
1
Rejected
2016
Motivation: the review process was extremely long.