Reviews for "Angewandte Chemie"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Angewandte Chemie n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The response was "unfortunately we have to inform you that it is not suitable for publication in Angewandte Chemie as the journal publishes only reviews, minireviews, highlights, essays, and short communications (see our "Notice to Authors" on the web). Your manuscript, on the other hand, is a full-length original paper and should thus be submitted to an appropriate journal."
Angewandte Chemie 2.0
weeks
2.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Angewandte Chemie n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Angewandte Chemie 3.3
weeks
3.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Angewandte Chemie 3.7
weeks
3.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Angewandte Chemie 2.0
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Angewandte Chemie 2.0
weeks
2.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: One clearly positive review with the number of suggestions to strenghen the manuscript, one "too specialized" comment. No invitation to resubmit the paper after implementing changes, requested by first referee.
Angewandte Chemie n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Our paper was a major improvement of a previous, rather questionable paper published in Angewandte Chemie by a big name in the field. However, it was rejected based on the fact that the topic was not interesting enough. So, why could the big name prof. publish his work? This makes no sense is is not a fair process.