Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.4 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The review was professional and timely.
After the revision was sent it was quickly processed and accepted.
It was clear that the reviewers had the relevant background
After the revision was sent it was quickly processed and accepted.
It was clear that the reviewers had the relevant background
4.6 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
4.7 weeks
8.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
1.9 weeks
1.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
The reviewers rejected the manuscript due to low advancement of the state-of-the-art, which suggested that they had reviewed the paper superficially. Nevertheless, their comments were reasonable and helpful for further revisions of our manuscript
1.3 weeks
1.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Note that this was an invited critical review, so this may have been factored in by the editorial staff to expedite publication.
3.7 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016