Reviews for "American Sociological Review"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
American Sociological Review 6.7
weeks
6.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: Lightning fast review times! A very smooth process. However the two reviewers were within a single subfield, which related to our topic but was not the central subfield it was speaking to.
American Sociological Review 8.6
weeks
8.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2021
American Sociological Review n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Motivation: Merely "interesting" and not "ground-breaking" apparently.
American Sociological Review 9.3
weeks
9.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: The manuscript was sent to reviewers very quickly. Although the reviews were mixed, with one proposing minor revisions and others raising issues that could be handled within a revision, the editors explained their rejection well and even proposed a prioritization of the reviewers' comments and suggested outlets to sent the manuscript next to.
American Sociological Review 17.7
weeks
17.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: Three reviewers indicating excitement about the results and some suggestions for improvement didn't cut it this time.
American Sociological Review n/a n/a 18.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
Motivation: a reject and resubmit because the editors saw the potential but wanted a broader (=longer) engagement with the literature
American Sociological Review 5.9
weeks
5.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2019
Motivation: Review process was quick and the reviews were of good quality, very methodical. Reviews were very positive so rejection was surprising, but the editor justified it as lack of theoretical development.
American Sociological Review 19.4
weeks
19.4
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2015
American Sociological Review n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: Very quick desk rejection with appropriate justification. Editors at ASR even took the time to comment on the paper, and suggested alternative publications channels.
American Sociological Review 5.0
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2015
Motivation: Fast review procedure, which is much appreciated
American Sociological Review 15.1
weeks
15.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2014
American Sociological Review n/a n/a 12.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2014
Motivation: Although it was immediately rejected, the editor explained extensively why it was rejected and gave some useful comments on the script.
American Sociological Review 23.7
weeks
54.1
weeks
n/a 4 3
(good)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2012