Reviews for "American Mineralogist"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
3.6 weeks	4.3 weeks	n/a	4	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2013
Motivation: I was completely satisfied with the Editorial handling of that manuscript. Although it was submitted as a Letter and finally accepted as a Regular Article, the publication process was quick and efficient.