Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The reviews were fair and comprehensive and seemed to be from experts in the field. I thought the process was a little slow and we sent at least one chasing email.
6.7 weeks
6.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
My sense is that the journal just didn't find our study interesting enough. Comments from reviewers were mainly positive, though the few critiques they did have will be helpful for resubmitting the paper elsewhere.
6.0 weeks
12.4 weeks
n/a
5 reports
Rejected
2015
Motivation:
I feel that we thoroughly and adequately addressed all reviewer concerns. After our resubmission the manuscript was rejected by the editorial board for reasons that were not initially indicated as problematic (e.g., the sample size).
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
n/a
n/a
15 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015