Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.0 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Reviewer and editor comments helped improve the paper. Duration of review was reasonable.
8.9 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Rejected
2017
Motivation: I do not understand why the Editors send the papers to reviewers if they think that an article does not have anyway enough priority for the journal, waisting Authors and Reviewers time.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Rejected
2010
Motivation: The reviews were thorough, polite, and useful.
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation: Communication was swift and polite.