Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
7.0 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Reviewer and editor comments helped improve the paper. Duration of review was reasonable.
8.9 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
I do not understand why the Editors send the papers to reviewers if they think that an article does not have anyway enough priority for the journal, waisting Authors and Reviewers time.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
The reviews were thorough, polite, and useful.
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
Communication was swift and polite.