Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
17.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
2019
7.3 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
1
Rejected
2017
Motivation: This journal goes for short, preliminary reviews before going for a full one. This preliminary reviewing process is fast and that's good. IMO the journal seems to be biased against some areas. The journal officially boasts to be of certain standard which is very much doubtful.
10.6 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
0
0
Rejected
2017
Motivation: Quality of review was extremely poor. It also had severely flawed statements based on which the recommendation was made. I challenged those statements through the editor. Reviewer did not respond!