Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.9 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
Motivation: I had a very positive experience with Agronomy Journal. The review process was quick and the reviews were insightful and constructive. The editorial handling was efficient. The submission website was a bit clunky, but not substantially different than any other journal. Highly recommended.