Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
16.9 weeks
22.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
Review process took very long. Inquiring about the situation yielded no answers. Finally, the interaction with the publisher (the huge Elsevier machinery) was rather unpleasant and difficult. The eventual editing was also not as I approved it in the last version.
34.0 weeks
34.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
The most disappointing aspects of the review process were the lack of depth of the review comments and the time it took to review.
8.7 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
n/a
n/a
83 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
The paper was rejection based on the fact that it did not fit enough within the journal objectives. The rejection came very fast, and they even suggested other journals that we could submit the article with.