Reviews for "Agricultural Water Management"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Agricultural Water Management 34.0
weeks
34.0
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The most disappointing aspects of the review process were the lack of depth of the review comments and the time it took to review.
Agricultural Water Management 8.7
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Agricultural Water Management n/a n/a 83.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Agricultural Water Management n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The paper was rejection based on the fact that it did not fit enough within the journal objectives. The rejection came very fast, and they even suggested other journals that we could submit the article with.