Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The editor contacted an associate editor and we received a very brief and tough response mostly criticizing methodological issues. The editors might reformulate their aims & scope as several papers on a very similar topic using a very similar methodology were published afterwards. The only major difference was that these case studies were located in developing countries.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
Motivation:
Editor provided an extremely quick response and seemed to have the best interests of the authors as a priority.