Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.3 weeks
15.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The manuscript was reviewed by 3 reviewers. One reviewer said that the overall quality of the paper cannot be judged based on a single review and wrote lots of comments, which I revised then thoughtfully. When the revised manuscript was sent to this reviewer again, he/she recommended a rejection. The other reviewer recommended a rejection straight at the beginning with incomprehensible reasons, e.g., the introduction is too short and the conclusions are too long.