Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.9 weeks
25.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The reviewer made excellent constructive comments on the paper. The changes were substantial but extremely helpful. S/He also directed me to several relevant literature in the field that improved the paper a lot.