Reviews for "Ageing and Society"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Ageing and Society | n/a | n/a | 35.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Ageing and Society | 31.9 weeks |
42.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The first review round took a long time, but since I was on maternity leave for most of that time it did not matter so much. Moreover, when I contacted the editorial office to ask them about the progress of my submission, apologies were made and satisfactory explanations given. The review reports I received were very helpful and they really improved the paper. | |||||||
Ageing and Society | 20.3 weeks |
32.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Ageing and Society | n/a | n/a | 14.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Ageing and Society | 14.6 weeks |
23.2 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: First round of the review process took a bit long but overall the reviewers provided constructive and helpful feedback. | |||||||
Ageing and Society | 9.4 weeks |
9.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Two reviewers were divided and editor did not want to advise a major revision of the paper. | |||||||
Ageing and Society | 7.6 weeks |
13.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: It was not the fastest process, but I was very content with the way the journal handled the submission and the quality of the reviews. | |||||||
Ageing and Society | 17.0 weeks |
25.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The process was well organized, although the first review round could have been shorter |