Reviews for "Ageing and Society"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Ageing and Society n/a n/a 35.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Ageing and Society 31.9
weeks
42.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The first review round took a long time, but since I was on maternity leave for most of that time it did not matter so much. Moreover, when I contacted the editorial office to ask them about the progress of my submission, apologies were made and satisfactory explanations given. The review reports I received were very helpful and they really improved the paper.
Ageing and Society 20.3
weeks
32.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Ageing and Society n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Ageing and Society 14.6
weeks
23.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: First round of the review process took a bit long but overall the reviewers provided constructive and helpful feedback.
Ageing and Society 9.4
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Two reviewers were divided and editor did not want to advise a major revision of the paper.
Ageing and Society 7.6
weeks
13.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: It was not the fastest process, but I was very content with the way the journal handled the submission and the quality of the reviews.
Ageing and Society 17.0
weeks
25.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The process was well organized, although the first review round could have been shorter