Reviews for "Ageing and Society"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 35.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
31.9
weeks
42.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: The first review round took a long time, but since I was on maternity leave for most of that time it did not matter so much. Moreover, when I contacted the editorial office to ask them about the progress of my submission, apologies were made and satisfactory explanations given. The review reports I received were very helpful and they really improved the paper.
20.3
weeks
32.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
14.6
weeks
23.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: First round of the review process took a bit long but overall the reviewers provided constructive and helpful feedback.
9.4
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2017
Motivation: Two reviewers were divided and editor did not want to advise a major revision of the paper.
7.6
weeks
13.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: It was not the fastest process, but I was very content with the way the journal handled the submission and the quality of the reviews.
17.0
weeks
25.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The process was well organized, although the first review round could have been shorter