Reviews for "Advances in Water Resources"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
43.4
weeks
49.9
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2016
Motivation: I received first round of revision, including one reviewer and the AE, after ~10 months. The AE was quite positive. I revised and resubmitted. The sole reviewer that we got in the first round was fully satisfied but the AE had invited another reviewer who made some so-called major comments. Although these major comments were not rightful (some were even contradicted by the reviewer himself), the AE rejected the manuscript primarily because lack of sufficient novelty (which was indeed acknowledged by both reviewers). So, after ~15 months, I decided to submit this manuscript to another journal...
12.9
weeks
12.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2015