Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.9 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
This is a great journal, even if the process was pretty long. This happened due to the reviewers, not due to the Editor. After the first major revision, the original 2 reviewers did not accept the invitation to review the revised manuscript, therefore the editor had to find a new reviewer. After the second round (minor), the paper had been accepted within a week.
3.7 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Professionally and efficiently handled. The reviewers comments were useful and fair. Very pleased.
9.4 weeks
13.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
4.4 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation:
Unfortunately, following editorial evaluation, we are unable to consider it further for publication in Advanced Optical Materials; however, we believe that your manuscript could be suitable for a sister journal with a more focused readership. We would therefore like to offer you a direct transfer, and my colleagues will be happy to evaluate your paper further here:
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
9.6 weeks
10.5 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2020