Reviews for "Advanced Materials"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Advanced Materials 3.6
weeks
5.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The only problem is they do not update you on the status of your manuscript for the moment you submit it, it just stayed at "under consideration", which made us feel that it was still under editorial review. Being a prestigious journal, we thought it needed more time for the editor to make the decision to send it out to reviewers, for all that we know after close to 3 weeks, we received the reviewers' comment, then did we realize it has passed editorial review. Overall, they are very fast for my case, 3 weeks for the first review, was given 10 days to complete the first revision and the second revision came in 14 days time. After that, the editor mentioned that it was just a minor revision and if we addressed it, he will give us a final decision as soon as possible. Almost immediately when after submitting our minor revision, the editor came back within one working day to accept our paper for post-production. Kudos!
Advanced Materials 2.4
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very satisfied with the publication process at Advanced Materials. Very efficient handling of the manuscript, prompt responses between authors and editors, and reasonable revision requests to the manuscript. Would submit future work for publication here.
Advanced Materials n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Advanced Materials 4.9
weeks
4.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Advanced Materials 2.9
weeks
4.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Editorial policy was used to finally judge the paper. Requesting a large animal study to support an already extensive work is unreasonable.
Advanced Materials n/a n/a 14.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Advanced Materials 3.0
weeks
3.1
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Advanced Materials 3.4
weeks
3.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: review process was very quick. We received comments from 2 reviewer's. One of the reviewer suggested relevant changes to the manuscript and second reviewer was more or less naive with his comments, who simply rejected the manuscript, without going through the text thoroughly. Therefore editor decided to reject our manuscript for possible publication in Advanced Materials.
Advanced Materials 2.0
weeks
3.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted