Reviews for "Advanced Functional Materials"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Advanced Functional Materials n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Motivation: The Editor who evaluated my paper was not from my field. Her PhD was in Molecular Medicines while my area is semiconductor Physics exactly The LED. It was very bad experience.
Advanced Functional Materials 5.3
weeks
5.3
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Advanced Functional Materials n/a n/a 21.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Advanced Functional Materials 4.3
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: After we asked the Editor for any update regarding the paper the 1st round of review came quickly. Reports from 1 reviewer in particular were overly destructive and led to outright rejection.
Advanced Functional Materials 6.6
weeks
6.6
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Drawn back 2018
Advanced Functional Materials n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
Advanced Functional Materials 11.6
weeks
11.6
weeks
n/a 1 1
(bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2018
Advanced Functional Materials n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Advanced Functional Materials 7.1
weeks
7.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2016
Advanced Functional Materials 4.4
weeks
6.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2015