Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.1 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
1. 피드백이 다른 저널에 비해 빠르게 도착하였음
2. publish는 accept 되더라도 한 달 이상 소요됨
2. publish는 accept 되더라도 한 달 이상 소요됨
4.4 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
We were lucky to have a fair editor. Although one of the reviewers came up with an unconstructive criticism during the second review round, the editor decided to accept the paper after our response.
4.6 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
One of the two review reports received recommended the rejection of the manuscript. This review report was intentionally and unnecessarily long and contained a different point for any small thing that the reviewer deemed imprecise or missing. Most of the comments were not actually relevant to the work and some were clearly in contradiction to the manuscript's contents. Nonetheless, the editor decided to reject the manuscript based on this highly problematic review only.
4.3 weeks
4.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
4.11 submitted / 5.11 received review comments / 5.15 resubmitted revised manuscript / 5.17 accepted — two reviewer direct accept (guess) / one minor revision
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
They offered a transfer to the sister open-access journal Advanced Engineering Materials.
3.7 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation:
(appropriately) transferred to a sister journal
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
The editor offered us a direct transfer to a sister journal.
8.6 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation:
The Editor who evaluated my paper was not from my field. Her PhD was in Molecular Medicines while my area is semiconductor Physics exactly The LED. It was very bad experience.
5.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2019
n/a
n/a
21 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
After we asked the Editor for any update regarding the paper the 1st round of review came quickly. Reports from 1 reviewer in particular were overly destructive and led to outright rejection.
6.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Drawn back
2018
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
11.6 weeks
11.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2018
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
7.1 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
4.4 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015