Reviews for "Administration and Society"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
9.3 weeks	22.6 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2014
Motivation: Significant changes needed to be done to the manuscript, but after doing this it was accepted by the reviewers with minor revision.
25.4 weeks	33.3 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted	2012
Motivation: This is not the only positive case of this kind in my scholarly life. In this type case, the editor, who is a veterate authority in the respective scholarly field, obviously made it his cause to help the author to navigate through the process. This meant in this case, and meant the same in others, that the editor used his discretion as to what the referee reports imply. One way to express the character of this type of procedure is to indicate the editor as a coach, who sees in a manuscript values that can be cherished, and therefore assumes a constructive stand and helps the author to fulfil the requirements that the editor defines, using his discretion.
21.7 weeks	21.7 weeks	n/a	1	0 (very bad)	0 (very bad)	Rejected	2011