Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.3 weeks
22.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Significant changes needed to be done to the manuscript, but after doing this it was accepted by the reviewers with minor revision.
25.4 weeks
33.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
This is not the only positive case of this kind in my scholarly life. In this type case, the editor, who is a veterate authority in the respective scholarly field, obviously made it his cause to help the author to navigate through the process. This meant in this case, and meant the same in others, that the editor used his discretion as to what the referee reports imply. One way to express the character of this type of procedure is to indicate the editor as a coach, who sees in a manuscript values that can be cherished, and therefore assumes a constructive stand and helps the author to fulfil the requirements that the editor defines, using his discretion.
21.7 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2011