Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
43.7 weeks
43.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
Based on the feedback received, the process was editorially vs. peer-driven, as all peer reviewers gave generally positive and encouraging assessments. The ultimate reason for rejection given was present from the first submission. Ethically speaking, if this was an issue for the journal, the manuscript should have been rejected in the first round instead of requesting we go through multiple rounds of review, telling us we did a good job, and then rejecting us. Now, our results are no longer timely, and we will have more difficulty publishing elsewhere.
12.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
13.0 weeks
14.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
n/a
n/a
30 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013