Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2020
6.7 weeks
13.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
9.6 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Rejected
2017
Motivation: The reviewers did not read the paper properly and their comments were too general. One reviewer could not open a figure due to technical problems but instead of asking the editorial office he adressed this issue as one reason to reject the manuscript. The other reviewer could not find the task description in the figure legends. I prefer a desk reject instead of waiting two months for such unprofessional comments.
9.3 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2016
6.5 weeks
9.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2014
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013