Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.0 weeks
13.2 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The subject editor had problems finding more than one willing referee, so acted him/her-self as referee. Took some time though.
19.3 weeks
19.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Rejected
2015
Motivation: The review process took far too long for a rejection, and the reviewers did not gave much more information on improving the MS. It should not have taken so long. I will not consider this Journal for a future MS submission.