Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2026
Motivation:
We found the previous reviewer's critiques to be insightful and valid. Consequently, we have utilized that feedback as a framework for significant revisions, ensuring this version of the manuscript meets a higher standard of technical depth.
4.3 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
The initial manuscript underwent evaluation by three independent reviewers. While two provided limited feedback—one recommending acceptance without revisions and the other offering a general rejection—the third reviewer provided a series of insightful and constructive critiques. These comprehensive comments proved instrumental in significantly enhancing the technical depth and overall quality of the revised paper.