Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.3 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The editor was prompt in all communications and the reviewer feedback was thorough. There was a sexist microaggression in the feedback, which was surprising from a "feminist" journal. Submitting is easy, but the journal does not accurately describe its requirements for authors; the need for "insider" knowledge in order to be competitive was also surprising from a "feminist" journal. I hope they align their stated values to their processes.