Review this journal

Traffic Injury Prevention

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 3.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds n/a compare →
Quality of review reports 0.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 7.0 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
The paper went through three rounds of review by 2 clueless reviewers, one of whom was probably the editor. One reviewer went completely wild in the first round about how invalid one of our methods was (and obviously didn't know what it was); after we defended it the same reviewer acted like an expert in that method and accused us of not applying it carefully (my co-authors are world experts in the method!). The second reviewer (who was probably the editor) didn't read past the introduction. After two rounds of review, the second reviewer finally read the paper and raised totally off-the-wall objections. The editor finally accepted the paper conditional on us making changes that would produce an invalid analysis, so we withdrew it instead.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Traffic Injury Prevention has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Public health

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.