Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
5.3 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.6 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.3 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.3 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.6 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.9 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 17.1 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I liked the reviews, although my article was rejected. However, I didn't like the editor comments. Although the reviewers suggested major revisions or revise and resubmitt, the editorial board rejected the article. Moreover, their add their opinion regarding one part of the article, that was different than what reviewers wrote. Overall, I rate reviewers work really high, but editorial board not so well.