Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 8.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
This journal wasted our time. If they intended to defer to a single review about the appropriateness of a type of study design for the journal, this should actually be journal policy, rather than following the whims of a reviewer. Further, it is disappointing that they held this review in such high regard when the reviewer ignored all the revisions made in response to their initial comments.