Latest review
First review round: 70.9 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad).
Outcome: Rejected.
Motivation:
This is, by far, the worst handled/managed journal that I know. A complete mess should be expected when submitting a paper. No clear guidelines for authors or adequate point of contact; for instance, before accepting my article for review, an editorial assistant insisted on modifying it five times based only on the resolution and pixels of the graphics used. Unresponsive staff and extremely slow editorial process. There are many other journals that will always treat authors and submissions in a more respectful manner. After this long delay, I submitted my paper to a Q2 journal and was immediately accepted.
