Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 6.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 6.2 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 26.0 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Accepted.

The review process was quite long. Reviewer #2 improved the quality of the manuscript, making interesting comments, highlighting typing errors and suggesting a better organization of the text. On the contrary, Reviewer #1 did not add useful comments and argued that English language should be improved. It was funny to notice that Reviewer #2 placed at least 5 English language mistakes in its review made of 185 words.