Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Relations Industrielles has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 8.5 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 10.0 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 4.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 36.7 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

I received 3 rather good quality, rigorous reviews. The reviewers were knowledgeable on the topic of the paper and helped me improve the paper. Moreover, the statistical analyses were evaluated by methodological adviser. Nice work! RI/IR is taking scientific rigor seriously, other journals could learn from this, including a few higher-ranked ones. The first round took rather long, and the lack of online submission system meant that it's not possible to track the status of the manuscript without contacting the editors. However, communication with the editorial office was excellent. This was the first time I have submitted something to RI/IR and I was very pleasantly surprised with the quality of the process.