Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.4 months
Decision time immediate rejection
16 days
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.8 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
2.3 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
3.3 / 5.0 (moderate)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports
Quality of review reports
4.5 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.6 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Review/decision process was prompt and it was possible to track status. Review quality was exceptional—extremely thoughtful expert feedback that led to a much stronger paper after revisions. I'd consider my experience an exemplar of the peer review process and good science. Moreover, I appreciated that the publisher sought structured feedback following the final decision, indicating commitment to a good process.