Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.6 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.7 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
4.5 / 5.0 (very difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.7 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.3 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.3 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 9.7 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I think as the reviewers, please abandon your academic superiority. You became a reviewer because you are capable, but this is not a reason to trample on others. If you don’t like it, think there is a problem, or it is incorrect, please tell me how to change it to meet your expectations. If the problem is very serious, please tell me that this is an unqualified manuscript and reject it. There is no need to trample on my personality and tell me that what I wrote is shit. I think respect is mutual and there is no need to attack me. Thank you for spending so much time trying to insult me, but I will not give up my academic path because of your denial.