Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
4.0 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
4.0 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 17.6 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
One reviewer made very positive comments while the other did not seem to speak English as a first language, and requested changes indicated that he/she did not understand the methods of the study. When this was pointed out to the action editor and editor, we were invited to resubmit the manuscript and told that it would undergo another full review with new reviewers. This was unacceptable, and we declined.