Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The review process at Phytomedicine is frustrating and unprofessional. The only feedback one typically receives is a brief statement that the article does not fit the aim and scope of the journal. This lack of transparency and constructive criticism wastes valuable time for researchers. Rather than providing specific guidance or engaging with the content of the submission, the journal dismisses articles with little explanation. Given this, I would not recommend wasting your time on Phytomedicine. There are far more professional and responsive journals to consider.