SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 9.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 24.1 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The process was slow, but much of the time was due to delay in starting revisions on our part. The first reviews were very mixed: two were extremely positive, and the third was mean and generally unhelpful. The mean review asked for a lot of changes that we didn't think would improve the paper, and many of them are things we were asked to change back during the second round of reviews. Overall, we thought the editors handled the situation extremely well, though, and the paper was much improved as a result.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Phonology has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Linguistics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.