SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.8 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 8.6 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 3.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.3 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.3 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 4.3 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.3 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 20.3 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
I was deeply impressed by how quickly and smoothly this was handled. The reviews were extremely rigorous, and while they required a huge reworking of the paper to address, they were still very encouraging. The editors were very transparent and prompt in communications, and said that the revision would go to the Associate Editor, who would either approve it or send it back to the reviewers; I appreciated this level of communication about the process. The time between acceptance and assignment to a volume for publication was shorter than I would have expected.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Phonology has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Linguistics

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.