SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.3 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.7 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 0.7 weeks. Overall rating: 4 (very good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The comments and requests of the reviewers were very precise and coherent to our work and the initial submission was inside an acceptable time frame (first submission 11.04.2018; reviewers comments letter (with the feedeback arrived on 21.05.18). The waiting time after resubmission was longer (16.07.2018 - 28.09.2018), however for a good journal like Oncogene might be still in order.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Oncogene has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.