Latest review
First review round: 30.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent).
Outcome: Accepted.
Motivation:
I am quite proud of this article. It was written by the first author, who was a doctoral student that I mentored for his PhD. The editor of the journal had difficulty finding suitable peer reviewers, as this was a proposed model for occupational therapy that had not been adequately researched. I look forward to more publications about the first author's dissertation research and his continued future research to generate more research in the field of occupational therapy.
