Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Nano Energy has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Energy, Materials science

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round 1.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 1.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 1.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.7 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review

First review round: 7.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Only 1 reviewer report was provided along with the rejection letter. The reviewer comments mostly focused on the technical imperfection of the paper instead of the scientific significance/knowledge the paper bears. One of the exact comment from the reviewer sounds "The original idea of the paper is lackluster to be considered for publication in high impact journal like Nano Energy". The editor's decision based solely on a single reviewer's comments is unconvincing.