Review this journal

Nano Energy

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 3 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.6 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.7 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 1.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 1.5 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 0.7 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 7.9 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Only 1 reviewer report was provided along with the rejection letter. The reviewer comments mostly focused on the technical imperfection of the paper instead of the scientific significance/knowledge the paper bears. One of the exact comment from the reviewer sounds "The original idea of the paper is lackluster to be considered for publication in high impact journal like Nano Energy". The editor's decision based solely on a single reviewer's comments is unconvincing.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Nano Energy has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a
Disciplines: Energy, Materials science

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.