Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.8 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
3.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
5.0 / 5.0 (very difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports
Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Highly in-depth or detailed review that initially enhanced the manuscript following the presence of major issues. Subsequent reviews where then somewhat futile and potentially held up the publication process. N.B., studies on manual aiming/interception may likely go to or favour selection of one particular reviewer that provides useful insights, although incredibly "long-winded" and exhaustive to handle.