Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
3.8 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
3.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
5.0 / 5.0 (very difficult)
Average number of review reports
2.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
4.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
3.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 4.7 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
Highly in-depth or detailed review that initially enhanced the manuscript following the presence of major issues. Subsequent reviews where then somewhat futile and potentially held up the publication process. N.B., studies on manual aiming/interception may likely go to or favour selection of one particular reviewer that provides useful insights, although incredibly "long-winded" and exhaustive to handle.