SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.4 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.5 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 3.4 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Overall the submission process and review were fast and straightforward. Apart from some problem with the manuscript submission system, all was fine. (No manuscript number was assigned at first and received an error message followed by support, but apparently caused no delay). The handling editor was very efficient for speed. I'd have appreciated lengthier reviews, though: 3 reviewers made rather superficial suggestions. I however believe they were selected from reviewers I suggested, so this was not up to the journal and next time I'll just suggest others.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Micron has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.