Review this journal

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 1 review)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.4 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 6.0 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Review process was painless really. Reviews were useful; they had opposite views which really helped develop some of the work. Timings above are to the best of memory. The only real issue, small but annoying, was the journal website said APA referencing style 3, on submission the editor initially instantly rejected it as he said APA 5, but the reviewers were on APA 6 (or other). This took a while to fix, but was just tedious. It would be great if Journals would create an Endnote/other style for download, it might seem lazy, but it would save everyone time and allow focus on the actual detail of the work. It would also allow for changes in referencing styles to easily fixed/updated.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Editorial board

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.